Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

This journal accommodates articles / scientific works which has not been published yet. Fields of journal cover aspects of non-ruminant nutrition, ruminant nutrition and forage science.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The research article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed at least 2 (two) reviewers by the blind peer-review process. The peer review process will take approximately 14 regular days. The accepted research articles will be available online following the journal peer-reviewing process. The journal is published in twice a year.

Peer reviewers are external experts chosen by editors to provide written opinions, with the aim of improving the study. The action of peer review following terms:

  1. Suggestion from authors as to who might act as reviewers are often useful, but there should be no obligation on editors to use those suggested.
  2. The duty of confidentiality in the assessment of a manuscript must be maintained by expert reviewers and this extends to reviewer’s colleagues who may be asked (with the editor’s permission) to give opinions on specific sections.
  3. Reviewers and editors should not make any use of the data, arguments, or interpretations, unless they have the author’s permission.
  4. Reviewers should provide speedy, accurate, courteous, unbiased and justifiable reports.
  5. If reviewers suspect misconduct, they should write in confidence to the editor.
  6. Journals should publish accurate descriptions of their peer review, selection, and appeals processes.
  7. Journals should also provide regular audits of their acceptance rates and publication times.

 

Publication Frequency

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics

Our Publication Ethics is mainly based on Elsevier policies and Committee on Publication Ethics/ COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. These guidelines should be useful for authors, editorial board, and reviewers. These guidelines are intended to be advisory rather than prescriptive, and to evolve over time. We hope that they will be disseminated widely, endorsed by editors and refined by those who use them.